What changes
One reading spine
World Context gives the day one cited brief first, then lets the private account branch into your interests.
Public beta
One daily brief for people who want context, not another feed.
World Context reads across selected investigative, regional, specialist, and dissenting sources, then turns the public layer into one cited brief with uncertainty and source differences visible. A free account adds a private reading path around your interests.
What changes
Sources stay visible
The brief is mediation, not replacement. It keeps the original reporting and source roles in view.
What changes
Personalized, but bounded
Your settings shape sequencing and emphasis. Quality gates still decide what is strong enough to represent the product.
How it reads
World Context treats sources as evidence with different jobs.
The product does not ask every source to play the same role. It tracks what a source is good for, where it may overreach, and when a claim needs another angle before it should shape the brief.
Source role
Is this reporting, analysis, specialist context, regional signal, or dissenting interpretation?
Trust mode
How should the system treat this source: grounded evidence, expert framing, commentary, or a source that needs corroboration?
Rhetoric risk
Does the source clarify the issue, or does it rely on heat, slogans, and overconfident framing?
Private account
Personalization changes the path, not the evidence standard.
- Balanced keeps a steady range across your interests.
- Strict stays close to the beats you rank highest.
- Light lets nearby context in when it helps the brief make sense.