Editorial policy
How public briefs are selected, made, and corrected.
This policy applies to World Context's public daily briefs, weekly synthesis, archive, topic pages, and machine-readable feeds. Last reviewed July 27, 2026.
Selection
A public brief should cover a consequential development supported by multiple independent source families. Novelty alone is not enough. The topic must be coherent, timely, and suitable for a source-grounded explanation.
Sources and evidence
Source roles are kept distinct. Official records, original reporting, specialist context, regional reporting, commentary, and dissenting interpretation are not treated as interchangeable. Briefs link to the underlying items readers can inspect.
Automation and responsibility
Automated systems help gather, compare, draft, and quality-check public briefs. That automation can make mistakes. World Context remains responsible for the published mediation and does not transfer that responsibility to cited sources.
Uncertainty and change signals
A brief should state what remains uncertain and name observable evidence that could materially change its conclusion. A missing or generic watch signal is a publication-quality failure, not a cosmetic omission.
Corrections
Material factual, attribution, sourcing, or context errors should be corrected promptly. When a correction changes the substance of a published brief, the brief should be updated transparently rather than silently repurposed into a different story.
Complaints and conflicts
Readers and cited publishers can report errors, disputed attribution, inaccessible sources, or potential conflicts. Promotional placement does not determine brief selection, and World Context does not accept payment for a favorable conclusion.
Report an error
Use the support form or email worldcontext.tutor@gmail.com. Include the brief URL, the disputed passage, and supporting evidence.
Open support